Table of Contents
Never ever had an engine problem. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I wonder how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time leaving it's own means ... the 300i6 would certainly do everything I require this truck to do patgizz wrote: 3 things in the automobile world refuse to break.
those should be held as the benchmark to which whatever else is gauged. Practically whatever else fades in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 obviously) Wow, as a result of the outpour of appreciation, it looked great so I got it, below's the ad lmk what you people think Oops, didn't indicate to be cryptic, it slipped my mind that the "5.0" was practically a 4.9 l.
initially order of biz though, I'm relatively large, and the guiding wheel to seat is relatively narrow ... guy that wheel cover was not ribbed for my satisfaction:-LRB- The only problem I've ever before seen with vehicles like that, are damaged shifters. Ford made them a little also hard and they would break right at the floorboard.
Bear in mind the gas mileage will not be the finest on the planet, however it will certainly damn sure run for life. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had lots of space in the taxi of them. wbjones created: Brian created: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine issue.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it just appeared like a diesel. I ask yourself just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time obtaining out of it's own means ... The engine bay wasn't designed for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One Canister remove an engine from a '97 style F-150 from the top, but it sucks.
WonkoTheSane wrote: spitfirebill composed: In respond to HappyAndy: Thanks Captain Obvious What did he claim to necessitate this? I'm truly interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would certainly need this feedback. "They are normally trusted as gravity so long as they aren't sludged up" What engine loves sludge? Knurled composed: wbjones wrote: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Rust is a different story. When the exhaust rusted off behind the feline it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 highway with the OD5. I question just how hard a swap it would certainly be to obtain it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Extremely very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I didn't make clear ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I added that factor because when I needed to locate a substitute 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through each in every junkyard in South Jersey to find one that wasn't sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a far better van, while we're going to talk regarding a few issues of these vans, however I I'm clearly not going to come out and state one is better than the various other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are several of the differences between these 2 brand names? Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same automobile.
They seem to be a bit a lot more used in that area, however, you recognize, those are a few of the usages, yet they're basically the same category of lorry. Mark: So, well, allow's start with engines after that. What issues do you see in between these 2 vehicles? Bernie: Yeah. Let's speak regarding engine and really simply to specify that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I indicate, these vans have actually been around for a lengthy time.
And, you understand, for a version of a Chevy van has been around considering that, you know, around that time too. So we're not going to get back right into, right into the earlier stuff. Because 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are far more popular and I wouldn't actually recommend a V6 engine.
There's a great deal of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with impact to these engines, because they really did not have sufficient threading in the trigger plug, which caused problems.
Extremely extremely cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had actually currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek article, that I really did not explain ... my poor In reply to spitfirebill: I added that point since when I had to find a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go through each in every junkyard in South Jacket to find one that had not been sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a much better van, while we're going to speak regarding a few issues of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not going to come out and claim one is far better than the other. Bernie: Well, they're basically the very same lorry.
Mark: So, well, let's begin with engines after that. Allow's talk about engine and actually just to define that the design years, we're going to begin from 2000 and up, you know, I imply, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you recognize, for a variation of a Chevy van has been around given that, you recognize, around that time too. We're not going to get back right into, into the earlier stuff. Given that 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s. V8s are a lot more prominent and I would not actually recommend a V6 engine.
There's a whole lot of problems with these engines. In the earlier 2000 stimulate plugs with strike to these engines, because they didn't have sufficient threading in the stimulate plug, which created troubles.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer around Nashville-Davidson, Tennessee
Ford F150 dealer
Ford F150 dealership near me Nashville-Davidson, Tennessee